Riverside review

Browser recording studio that captures every remote guest locally in 4K, then edits and publishes the episode.

Visit site →
In short · updated 2026-08-28
The most dependable way to record remote guests at broadcast quality, though the built-in editor stops well short of finished long-form video.
Riverside website, homepage
Riverside homepage, captured 2026-08-28

Pros

  • Local per-participant recording means a guest on poor wifi still produces a clean 4K file
  • Guests join from a link in the browser with no account and no software to install
  • Separate downloadable tracks per speaker keep the option to finish the edit in Premiere or Resolve
  • Text-based editor lets a non-editor cut a conversation by deleting words from the transcript
  • Magic Clips turns a long recording into vertical social cuts without a separate tool

Cons

  • Users still report upload stalls, audio sync glitches and browser quirks that are awkward to troubleshoot mid-session
  • Separate-track download hours are metered on the lower tiers, and a team publishing weekly hits that limit before any other one
  • The free tier watermarks exports and caps multi-track recording at two hours, so it works as a trial rather than a working plan

Riverside pricing

List prices in USD per month, taken from the vendor at review time.

Plan Per month What it covers
Free Free 2 hours of multi-track recording, 720p, watermarked exports
Pro $29 per month billed monthly; 5 recording hours, 4K, no watermark
Grow $39 per month billed monthly; 15 recording hours, live streaming
Webinar $99 per month billed monthly; unlimited recording, webinar hosting

What Riverside actually does

Riverside records remote interviews by capturing each participant locally, in the browser, rather than recording the video call itself. Every guest's microphone and camera write to their own machine at up to 4K video and uncompressed audio, and those files upload in the background while the conversation runs. The result is that a guest on hotel wifi produces the same file as a guest on fibre: connection quality affects what the host hears live, not what ends up in the edit. Guests join from a link, with no account and nothing to install.

Around that recording core sits a production suite. A text-based editor lets an operator cut the conversation by deleting words from the transcript, with a separate track held for each speaker. AI tools generate short vertical clips from long recordings, strip filler words, correct eye contact, and translate or dub into a long list of languages. Finished episodes can be pushed to podcast platforms, scheduled to social channels or sent as a newsletter without leaving the product. Higher tiers add multistreaming to several destinations at once and a webinar mode with registration, polls and lead capture.

Riverside, features page screenshot
Riverside: features

Key features

What the product does that a video call plus an editor does not:

  • Local per-participant recording at up to 4K video and 48 kHz uncompressed audio, uploaded progressively during the session
  • Separate downloadable tracks per speaker, for finishing in an external editor
  • Text-based editing driven by the transcript, with captions, branding, intros and outros
  • Magic Clips, which selects and crops short vertical cuts out of a long recording
  • Speech correction, filler-word removal and background noise cleanup on the audio track
  • Live streaming and multistreaming to several platforms, plus a webinar mode with registration forms and Q&A

Who it's for

Riverside is aimed at anyone who records conversations with people who are not in the room: interview podcasters, marketing teams producing customer stories, recruiters filming employer content, course creators working with remote instructors. A one-person operation gets the most out of it, because the work that would otherwise need a video editor - clip selection, caption styling, filler removal - happens in the same session as the recording.

It is the wrong tool for anyone whose output is finished long-form video with complex cuts, B-roll layering and colour work. The editor is designed to produce a clean version quickly, not a polished one, and experienced editors routinely record in Riverside and finish elsewhere. It is also awkward for mobile-first workflows, since full functionality lives in the desktop browser. And the entry tiers meter separate-track downloads by the hour, which is the constraint most weekly shows run into first.

How it compares

Zoom is free and universal, and for a conversation nobody will publish it remains the sensible choice; its recordings are compressed and single-track, which is precisely the problem Riverside exists to solve. Descript overlaps heavily on text-based editing and beats Riverside on editing depth and audio repair, but its remote recording is the weaker half of that product. SquadCast, now owned by Descript, matches the local-recording approach at a lower price with a thinner set of publishing and AI tools around it. Among the local-recording tools, Riverside covers the widest span from capture to distribution, which is also why it costs more.

Riverside, product page screenshot
Riverside: product

Verdict

Riverside solves the one problem that used to make remote interviews sound like remote interviews, and it does so reliably enough that recording quality is rarely what anyone discusses afterwards. The AI production layer is genuinely useful to teams without an editor on staff. The caveats are real: users still report upload stalls, occasional sync glitches and browser quirks, the free tier watermarks exports, and the hour limits on separate-track downloads arrive sooner than a weekly publisher expects. For interview-led shows it is close to the default choice. For heavily edited video it is only the first half of the pipeline.

Ready to try Riverside?

There's a free tier, so you can test it before committing.

More creators tools like Riverside